|
Post by Akron Hammers on May 1, 2019 18:47:15 GMT
For now I want to talk about this so we can get a few good options to vote on.
Right now I am thinking we add a UTL spot to the starters and 1 Bench spot.
I can be swayed to other ideas.
The biggest thing here is if we add cap or not, and if so how much. We will vote on a dollar amount if we vote to change the roster layout
Option 1: Leave the same
Option 2: 1 UTL Spot, 1 Bench spot
Option 3: 1 UTL Spot
Option 4: 1 Bench Spot
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2019 19:14:36 GMT
I personally like the roster setup as is, but won't hate it if we add the UTL & Bench spot. If we do add said spots, I definitely think we should increase the cap. How much I'm not sure (initial thought is like 5-10mil?).
|
|
|
Post by Akron Hammers on May 3, 2019 2:59:11 GMT
I added a few options and think having a separate poll salary cap after is the best course of action here
|
|
|
Post by New England High Tide on May 4, 2019 13:25:12 GMT
I'm with the Blouses. I'm generally fine with the current roster format but an additional UTIL or something wouldn't be the worst thing.
|
|
|
Post by Akron Hammers on May 4, 2019 16:04:07 GMT
The reason this is being brought up, is that a few people said it seemed like there were a lot of quality players in the FA pool during the season, and I tend to agree with them, so I think at worst adding 1 bench spot and rostering 16 more guys won't hurt the FA pool a whole lot, and also adding a bench spot might help create open spots during the season so we can have more trades than we did this first season, only having a handful during the season was not what I or probably anyone would have had expected.
|
|